Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
Woo-Hyun Chung 4 Articles
Signification and Application of Mutator and Antimutator Phenotype‑Induced Genetic Variations in Evolutionary Adaptation and Cancer Therapeutics
Woo-Hyun Chung
J. Microbiol. 2023;61(12):1013-1024.   Published online December 15, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-023-00091-z
  • 348 View
  • 3 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Mutations present a dichotomy in their implications for cellular processes. They primarily arise from DNA replication errors or damage repair processes induced by environmental challenges. Cumulative mutations underlie genetic variations and drive evolution, yet also contribute to degenerative diseases such as cancer and aging. The mutator phenotype elucidates the heightened mutation rates observed in malignant tumors. Evolutionary adaptation, analogous to bacterial and eukaryotic systems, manifests through mutator phenotypes during changing environmental conditions, highlighting the delicate balance between advantageous mutations and their potentially detrimental consequences. Leveraging the genetic tractability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers unique insights into mutator phenotypes and genome instability akin to human cancers. Innovative reporter assays in yeast model organisms enable the detection of diverse genome alterations, aiding a comprehensive analysis of mutator phenotypes. Despite significant advancements, our understanding of the intricate mechanisms governing spontaneous mutation rates and preserving genetic integrity remains incomplete. This review outlines various cellular pathways affecting mutation rates and explores the role of mutator genes and mutation-derived phenotypes, particularly prevalent in malignant tumor cells. An in-depth comprehension of mutator and antimutator activities in yeast and higher eukaryotes holds promise for effective cancer control strategies.
Functional interplay between the oxidative stress response and DNA damage checkpoint signaling for genome maintenance in aerobic organisms
Ji Eun Choi , Woo-Hyun Chung
J. Microbiol. 2020;58(2):81-91.   Published online December 23, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-020-9520-x
  • 547 View
  • 1 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway is a highly conserved surveillance mechanism that ensures genome integrity by sequential activation of protein kinase cascades. In mammals, the main pathway is orchestrated by two central sensor kinases, ATM and ATR, that are activated in response to DNA damage and DNA replication stress. Patients lacking functional ATM or ATR suffer from ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) or Seckel syndrome, respectively, with pleiotropic degenerative phenotypes. In addition to DNA strand breaks, ATM and ATR also respond to oxidative DNA damage and reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggesting an unconventional function as regulators of intracellular redox status. Here, we summarize the multiple roles of ATM and ATR, and of their orthologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Tel1 and Mec1, in DNA damage checkpoint signaling and the oxidative stress response, and discuss emerging ideas regarding the possible mechanisms underlying the elaborate crosstalk between those pathways. This review may provide new insights into the integrated cellular strategies responsible for maintaining genome stability in eukaryotes with a focus on the yeast model organism.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of Stress on Biological Characteristics and Metabolism of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells of Deciduous Teeth
    Zhengyang Li, Jinyi Li, Shanshan Dai, Xuelong Su, Meiyue Ren, Shuyang He, Qingyu Guo, Fei Liu
    International Dental Journal.2025; 75(2): 908.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the potential genotoxicity and phototoxicity of triazine UV filters
    Yilian Wei, Meng Xiang, Jinyu Dong, Zhigang Wang, Xuan Wang, Hao Liu, Jianjun Liu, Wenli Xu, Jie Li, Yibei Zhan
    Journal of Dermatologic Science and Cosmetic Technology.2025; 2(2): 100087.     CrossRef
  • Genomic homeostasis and congenital cranio-maxillofacial malformations
    Zhiyuan Pan, Jingya Li, Hongwei Wang, Guofen Lin, Xiaoyi Zhang, Jiewen Dai
    Oral Science and Homeostatic Medicine.2025; 1(2): 9610008.     CrossRef
  • DSB-induced oxidative stress: Uncovering crosstalk between DNA damage response and cellular metabolism
    Xinyu Li, Caini Yang, Hengyu Wu, Hongran Chen, Xing Gao, Sa Zhou, Tong-Cun Zhang, Wenjian Ma
    DNA Repair.2024; 141: 103730.     CrossRef
  • Signification and Application of Mutator and Antimutator Phenotype-Induced Genetic Variations in Evolutionary Adaptation and Cancer Therapeutics
    Woo-Hyun Chung
    Journal of Microbiology.2023; 61(12): 1013.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Ataxia-Telangiectasia
    Goutham Narayanan Subramanian, Abrey Jie Yeo, Magtouf Hnaidi Gatei, David John Coman, Martin Francis Lavin
    Antioxidants.2022; 11(4): 653.     CrossRef
  • The Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 DNA Repair Clamp is Found in Microsporidia
    Anne Caroline Mascarenhas dos Santos, Alexander Thomas Julian, Jean-François Pombert, Emmanuelle Lerat
    Genome Biology and Evolution.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel insights into the mechanism of cell cycle kinases Mec1(ATR) and Tel1(ATM)
    Elias A. Tannous, Peter M. Burgers
    Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.2021; 56(5): 441.     CrossRef
  • DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans
    Shuangyan Yao, Yuting Feng, Yan Zhang, Jinrong Feng
    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.2021; 19: 6343.     CrossRef
  • Acute Toxicity and DNA Instability Induced by Exposure to Low Doses of Triclosan and Phthalate DEHP, and Their Combinations, in vitro
    Nathalia de Assis Aguilar Duarte, Lindiane Eloisa de Lima, Flora Troina Maraslis, Michael Kundi, Emilene Arusievicz Nunes, Gustavo Rafael Mazzaron Barcelos
    Frontiers in Genetics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The mechanism and prevention of mitochondrial injury after exercise
    Mingzhe Li, Baoan Ning, Tianhui Wang
    Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry.2021; 77(2): 215.     CrossRef
Synthetic lethal interaction between oxidative stress response and DNA damage repair in the budding yeast and its application to targeted anticancer therapy
Ji Eun Choi , Woo-Hyun Chung
J. Microbiol. 2019;57(1):9-17.   Published online December 29, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-8475-2
  • 561 View
  • 0 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Synthetic lethality is an extreme form of negative genetic epistasis that arises when a combination of functional deficiency in two or more genes results in cell death, whereas none of the single genetic perturbations are lethal by themselves. This unconventional genetic interaction is a modification of the concept of essentiality that can be exploited for the purpose of targeted cancer therapy. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been pivotally used for early large-scale synthetic lethal screens due to its experimental advantages, but recent advances in gene silencing technology have now made direct high-throughput analysis possible in higher organisms. Identification of tumor-specific alterations and characterization of the mechanistic principles underlying synthetic lethal interaction are the key to applying synthetic lethality to clinical cancer treatment by enabling genome-driven oncological research. Here, we provide emerging ideas on the synthetic lethal interactions in budding yeast, particularly between cellular processes responsible for oxidative stress response and DNA damage repair, and discuss how they can be appropriately utilized for context-dependent cancer therapeutics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • DNA Damage and Repair in Glioblastoma: Emerging Therapeutic Perspectives
    I. F. Gareev, O. A. Beylerli, S. A. Roumiantsev
    Creative surgery and oncology.2025; 15(2): 124.     CrossRef
  • Genetic Polymorphisms in Base Excision Repair (BER) and Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) Pathways as Potential Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Literature Review
    Magdalena Szatkowska, Julita Zdrada-Nowak
    Cancers.2025; 17(13): 2170.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Rewiring in the Face of Genomic Assault: Integrating DNA Damage Response and Cellular Metabolism
    Wenjian Ma, Sa Zhou
    Biomolecules.2025; 15(2): 168.     CrossRef
  • CSSLdb: Discovery of cancer-specific synthetic lethal interactions based on machine learning and statistic inference
    Yuyang Dou, Yujie Ren, Xinmiao Zhao, Jiaming Jin, Shizheng Xiong, Lulu Luo, Xinru Xu, Xueni Yang, Jiafeng Yu, Li Guo, Tingming Liang
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2024; 170: 108066.     CrossRef
  • ML216-Induced BLM Helicase Inhibition Sensitizes PCa Cells to the DNA-Crosslinking Agent Cisplatin
    Xiao-Yan Ma, Jia-Fu Zhao, Yong Ruan, Wang-Ming Zhang, Lun-Qing Zhang, Zheng-Dong Cai, Hou-Qiang Xu
    Molecules.2022; 27(24): 8790.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of chromosomal integrity in gastric cancers
    Rukui Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Xusheng Chang, Yuan Gao, Huan Han, Xiaona Liu, Hui Cai, Qiqing Fu, Lei Liu, Kai Yin
    The International Journal of Biological Markers.2022; 37(3): 296.     CrossRef
  • Functional interplay between the oxidative stress response and DNA damage checkpoint signaling for genome maintenance in aerobic organisms
    Ji Eun Choi, Woo-Hyun Chung
    Journal of Microbiology.2020; 58(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Genetic interactions derived from high-throughput phenotyping of 6589 yeast cell cycle mutants
    Jenna E. Gallegos, Neil R. Adames, Mark F. Rogers, Pavel Kraikivski, Aubrey Ibele, Kevin Nurzynski-Loth, Eric Kudlow, T. M. Murali, John J. Tyson, Jean Peccoud
    npj Systems Biology and Applications.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DNA damage induces Yap5-dependent transcription of ECO1/CTF7 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Michael G. Mfarej, Robert V. Skibbens, Marco Muzi-Falconi
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(12): e0242968.     CrossRef
To Peep into Pif1 Helicase: Multifaceted All the Way from Genome Stability to Repair-Associated DNA Synthesis
Woo-Hyun Chung
J. Microbiol. 2014;52(2):89-98.   Published online February 1, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-014-3524-3
  • 566 View
  • 3 Download
  • 23 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Pif1 DNA helicase is the prototypical member of a 5' to 3' helicase superfamily conserved from bacteria to humans. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pif1 and its homologue Rrm3, localize in both mitochondria and nucleus playing multiple roles in the maintenance of genomic homeostasis. They display relatively weak processivities in vitro, but have largely non-overlapping functions on common genomic loci such as mitochondrial DNA, telomeric ends, and many replication forks especially at hard-to-replicate regions including ribosomal DNA and G-quadruplex structures. Recently, emerging evidence shows that Pif1, but not Rrm3, has a significant new role in repair-associated DNA synthesis with Polδ during homologous recombination stimulating D-loop migration for conservative DNA replication. Comparative genetic and biochemical studies on the structure and function of Pif1 family helicases across different biological systems are further needed to elucidate both diversity and specificity of their mechanisms of action that contribute to genome stability.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Signification and Application of Mutator and Antimutator Phenotype-Induced Genetic Variations in Evolutionary Adaptation and Cancer Therapeutics
    Woo-Hyun Chung
    Journal of Microbiology.2023; 61(12): 1013.     CrossRef
  • The Pif1 helicase is actively inhibited during meiotic recombination which restrains gene conversion tract length
    Dipti Vinayak Vernekar, Giordano Reginato, Céline Adam, Lepakshi Ranjha, Florent Dingli, Marie-Claude Marsolier, Damarys Loew, Raphaël Guérois, Bertrand Llorente, Petr Cejka, Valérie Borde
    Nucleic Acids Research.2021; 49(8): 4522.     CrossRef
  • Approaching Protein Barriers: Emerging Mechanisms of Replication Pausing in Eukaryotes
    Maksym Shyian, David Shore
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Structural and functional studies of SF1B Pif1 from Thermus oshimai reveal dimerization-induced helicase inhibition
    Yang-Xue Dai, Wei-Fei Chen, Na-Nv Liu, Fang-Yuan Teng, Hai-Lei Guo, Xi-Miao Hou, Shuo-Xing Dou, Stephane Rety, Xu-Guang Xi
    Nucleic Acids Research.2021; 49(7): 4129.     CrossRef
  • When the Ends Justify the Means: Regulation of Telomere Addition at Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast
    Remington E. Hoerr, Katrina Ngo, Katherine L. Friedman
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lysine acetylation regulates the activity of nuclear Pif1
    Onyekachi E. Ononye, Christopher W. Sausen, Lata Balakrishnan, Matthew L. Bochman
    Journal of Biological Chemistry.2020; 295(46): 15482.     CrossRef
  • Yeast Genome Maintenance by the Multifunctional PIF1 DNA Helicase Family
    Julius Muellner, Kristina H. Schmidt
    Genes.2020; 11(2): 224.     CrossRef
  • Two Pif1 Family DNA Helicases Cooperate in Centromere Replication and Segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Chi-Fu Chen, Thomas J Pohl, Sebastian Pott, Virginia A Zakian
    Genetics.2019; 211(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Ku complex suppresses recombination in the absence of MRX activity during budding yeast meiosis
    Hyeseon Yun, Keunpil Kim
    BMB Reports.2019; 52(10): 607.     CrossRef
  • Structural basis for DNA unwinding at forked dsDNA by two coordinating Pif1 helicases
    Nannan Su, Alicia K. Byrd, Sakshibeedu R. Bharath, Olivia Yang, Yu Jia, Xuhua Tang, Taekjip Ha, Kevin D. Raney, Haiwei Song
    Nature Communications.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The nature of meiotic chromosome dynamics and recombination in budding yeast
    Soogil Hong, Jeong Hwan Joo, Hyeseon Yun, Keunpil Kim
    Journal of Microbiology.2019; 57(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • The Drosophila melanogaster PIF1 Helicase Promotes Survival During Replication Stress and Processive DNA Synthesis During Double-Strand Gap Repair
    Ece Kocak, Sarah Dykstra, Alexandra Nemeth, Catherine G Coughlin, Kasey Rodgers, Mitch McVey
    Genetics.2019; 213(3): 835.     CrossRef
  • The signature motif of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA helicase is essential in vivo for mitochondrial and nuclear functions and in vitro for ATPase activity
    Carly L Geronimo, Saurabh P Singh, Roberto Galletto, Virginia A Zakian
    Nucleic Acids Research.2018; 46(16): 8357.     CrossRef
  • DNA-unwinding activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 is modulated by thermal stability, folding conformation, and loop lengths of G-quadruplex DNA
    Lei Wang, Qing-Man Wang, Yi-Ran Wang, Xu-Guang Xi, Xi-Miao Hou
    Journal of Biological Chemistry.2018; 293(48): 18504.     CrossRef
  • Role of the Pif1-PCNA Complex in Pol δ-Dependent Strand Displacement DNA Synthesis and Break-Induced Replication
    Olga Buzovetsky, Youngho Kwon, Nhung Tuyet Pham, Claire Kim, Grzegorz Ira, Patrick Sung, Yong Xiong
    Cell Reports.2017; 21(7): 1707.     CrossRef
  • Structure and function of Pif1 helicase
    Alicia K. Byrd, Kevin D. Raney
    Biochemical Society Transactions.2017; 45(5): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Mechanistic and biological considerations of oxidatively damaged DNA for helicase-dependent pathways of nucleic acid metabolism
    Jack D. Crouch, Robert M. Brosh
    Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2017; 107: 245.     CrossRef
  • PIF1 family DNA helicases suppress R-loop mediated genome instability at tRNA genes
    Phong Lan Thao Tran, Thomas J. Pohl, Chi-Fu Chen, Angela Chan, Sebastian Pott, Virginia A. Zakian
    Nature Communications.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Yeast Helicase Pif1 Unwinds RNA:DNA Hybrids with Higher Processivity than DNA:DNA Duplexes
    Shubeena Chib, Alicia K. Byrd, Kevin D. Raney
    Journal of Biological Chemistry.2016; 291(11): 5889.     CrossRef
  • Getting it done at the ends: Pif1 family DNA helicases and telomeres
    Carly L. Geronimo, Virginia A. Zakian
    DNA Repair.2016; 44: 151.     CrossRef
  • Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast—sources and mechanisms
    Adrianna Skoneczna, Aneta Kaniak, Marek Skoneczny, Antoine Danchin
    FEMS Microbiology Reviews.2015; 39(6): 917.     CrossRef
  • TheBacteroides sp. 3_1_23Pif1 protein is a multifunctional helicase
    Na-Nv Liu, Xiao-Lei Duan, Xia Ai, Yan-Tao Yang, Ming Li, Shuo-Xing Dou, Stephane Rety, Eric Deprez, Xu-Guang Xi
    Nucleic Acids Research.2015; 43(18): 8942.     CrossRef
  • Yeast Pif1 Accelerates Annealing of Complementary DNA Strands
    Ramanagouda Ramanagoudr-Bhojappa, Alicia K. Byrd, Christopher Dahl, Kevin D. Raney
    Biochemistry.2014; 53(48): 7659.     CrossRef
Woo-Hyun Chung 1 Article
Synthetic rescue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Concepts, large-scale genetic mapping, and functional implications
Ji Eun Choi, Woo-Hyun Chung
Received December 30, 2025  Accepted February 2, 2026  Published online March 12, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.71150/jm.2512017    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 296 View
  • 16 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF

Synthetic rescue (SR) describes a genetic interaction in which the deleterious effect of a primary mutation is compensated by a second mutation, restoring cellular function or viability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, SR complements synthetic lethality (SL) by revealing compensatory mechanisms that maintain essential biological processes. Classical studies established SR as a fundamental principle of genetic robustness in yeast. Subsequent development of high-throughput genetic tools, including Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA), Epistatic Miniarray Profile (E-MAP), and CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), has enabled systematic identification of SR interactions across pathways of genome maintenance, proteostasis, and metabolism. Integration of these experimental datasets with computational and network-based analyses has transformed SR research from descriptive genetics into a predictive framework. Databases such as BioGRID, TheCellMap, and Mslar further support SR inference and link yeast genetic networks to human disease models. Understanding SR has important translational implications. The same compensatory logic that restores viability in yeast can explain therapeutic resistance in cancer cells. Together, these insights reveal SR as a powerful concept connecting microbial genetics with systems medicine, emphasizing that robustness and resilience are dynamic properties of living systems.


Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology
TOP