Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
An Sung Kwon 1 Article
The N3 Subdomain in A Domain of Fibronectin-Binding Protein B Isotype I Is an Independent Risk Determinant Predictive for Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
An Sung Kwon , Dong Hoon Lim , Hyo Jung Shin , Geon Park , Jong H. Reu , Hyo Jin Park , Jungmin Kim , Yong Lim
J. Microbiol. 2013;51(4):499-505.   Published online August 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-013-3319-y
  • 726 View
  • 0 Download
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Fibronectin-binding proteins (FnBP), FnBPA and FnBPB, are purported to be involved in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. This study was performed to find which of three consecutive N subdomains of the A domain in the FnBP is the key domain in FnBP. A total of 465 clinical isolates of S. aureus were examined for the biofilm forming capacity and the presence of N subdomains of FnBP. In the biofilm-positive strains, N2 and N3 subdomains of FnBPA, and N1 and N3 subdomains of FnBPB were significantly more prevalent. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 246 biofilm-positive and 123 biofilm-negative strains identified only the FnBPB-N3 subdomain as an independent risk determinant predictive for biofilm-positive strains of S. aureus (Odds ratio [OR], 13.174; P<0.001). We also attempted to delete each of the fnbA-N2 and -N3 and fnbB-N1 and -N3 from S. aureus strain 8325-4 and examined the biofilm forming capacity in the derivative mutants. In agreement with the results of the multivariate regression analysis, deletion of either the fnbA-N2 or -N3, or fnbB-N1 did not significantly diminish the capacity of strain 8325-4 to develop a biofilm, while deletion of the fnbB-N3 did. Therefore, it is suggested that the FnBPB-N3 subdomain of isotype I may be a key domain in FnBP which is responsible for the causing biofilm formation in S. aureus clinical isolates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus with different degrees of biofilm formation
    Hyo-Jung Shin, Sungtae Yang, Yong Lim
    Journal of Analytical Science and Technology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reductive evolution of virulence repertoire to drive the divergence between community- and hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the ST1 lineage
    Marina Farrel Côrtes, Ana Maria N. Botelho, Paula Terra Bandeira, William Mouton, Cedric Badiou, Michèle Bes, Nicholas C. B. Lima, André Elias R. Soares, Rangel C. Souza, Luiz G. P. Almeida, Patricia Martins-Simoes, Ana T. R. Vasconcelos, Marisa F. Nicolá
    Virulence.2021; 12(1): 951.     CrossRef
  • Biofilm Formation and Its Relationship with the Molecular Characteristics of Food‐Related Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Alberto Vergara, Giovanni Normanno, Pierluigi Di Ciccio, Francesca Pedonese, Roberta Nuvoloni, Antonio Parisi, Gianfranco Santagada, Angelo Colagiorgi, Emanuela Zanardi, Sergio Ghidini, Adriana Ianieri
    Journal of Food Science.2017; 82(10): 2364.     CrossRef
  • The role of biofilms in persistent infections and factors involved inica-independent biofilm development and gene regulation inStaphylococcus aureus
    Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo, Fabienne Antunes Ferreira, Cristiana Ossaille Beltrame, Marina Farrel Côrtes
    Critical Reviews in Microbiology.2017; 43(5): 602.     CrossRef
  • Protective role of gut commensal microbes against intestinal infections
    My Young Yoon, Keehoon Lee, Sang Sun Yoon
    Journal of Microbiology.2014; 52(12): 983.     CrossRef

Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology
TOP